2007年5月27日 星期日

達爾富爾和台灣

by 想像不到的天空 2007/05/27

感謝其邁出了一個很好的功課給我,昨晚看了一個晚上蘇丹達爾富爾內亂及中國二00八奧運的問題。我原本以為是我最近少看報紙,所以不知道此一聯合國近幾年來最重要的事件。

不過,在打進「蘇丹達爾富爾」關鍵字搜尋,發現台灣的媒體,竟然沒有這個事件的報導,再加上我問一位一定有看報的朋友,是否知道達爾富爾內戰的事,他也不知道,我想或許不是我孤陋寡聞。

相對於一個月前,國民黨及媒體對奧運聖火來台及蘇貞昌說不參加奧運的批判,中國因為蘇丹達爾富爾而被國際社會抵制,台灣絕大部分媒體卻絕口不提此事,就不難看出今天台灣的問題到底出在那裡。

非洲蘇丹的達爾富爾地區長久以來因為伊斯蘭教、基督教宗教問題;阿拉伯人、黑人的宗教及種族衝突,加上近年來石油能源的開發,從二00三年來,該地區的黑 人基於蘇丹政治無力保障黑人權益,組成「蘇丹解放運動」和「正義與公平運動」二大反政府武裝組織,導致數十萬人的喪生,以及上百萬人民流離失所。

從內戰開始,非洲團結聯盟及聯合國安理會多次介入調停,在安理會對蘇丹動用禁運制裁的表決中,中國及俄羅斯數度動用常任理事國的身分否決,而派維和部隊進入蘇丹的表決中,中國及俄羅斯又投下棄權票。

中國在蘇丹有數百億美元的投資,掌握達爾富爾百分五十以上石油利益,加上出售武器戰機給蘇丹,中國成為達爾富爾內戰背後最有力的推手、聯合國維和最大阻 力,當然,也是最大的得利者,而數十萬條人命,為中國利益陪葬,死傷人數每天都在增加中。然而,檯面上,中國還是高喊支持蘇丹的和平,維護人權。

從今年一月開始,國際上有人為中國在達爾富爾內戰中主導性的角色,發出譴責的聲音,其中,好萊塢影星米亞法羅發表公開聲明,指二00八奧運中國喊出「同一 個世界,同一個夢想」,而現在有另一個口號在流傳,那就是「種族屠殺的奧運會」,還有好幾個國家揚言,如果中國不解決達爾富爾的問題,將拒絕參加明年的奧 運會。

台灣的媒體中,除了大紀元時報曾經報導外,包括電視台在內,幾乎看不到達爾富爾內戰及奧運間的關係。網路上的訊息幾乎全都來自中國的官方媒體,自然也看不到米亞法羅的聲明。

幾天前,連方瑀出新書,提到她和「戰哥」將在不久後一起到中國旅行,而剛剛帶了三十幾個國親立委到中國才回台的連戰夫妻,顯然和中國的關係,顯然只有蜜裡調油四個字可以形容。

這幾年中國不再像過去的一樣,對台灣文攻武嚇,而是採取個個擊破式的收買策略,從國民黨、媒體、部分原住民人士等等,在意識型態及失去既得利益的仇恨的種種情緒交織下,小小的台灣已經成了「一個世界,無數個夢想」,有人夢想重新拿回政權。

我們小小的台灣啊!會不會是下一個達爾富爾?

當國際社會都知道中國在玩什麼把戲時,又該如何看待那些和中國唱和的人?

當國際社會都為中國主導他國內戰,攫取利益,而打算抵制奧運時,我們要不要為了中國刻意利用聖火矮化、分化台灣而吵成一團?

此柳哥非彼柳哥

by 慕容理深 2007/5/25

brother
《王哥柳哥遊台灣》(1958)
來源:
國家電影資料館


以「柳哥」為藝名的演員王泰山先生於5月23日以67歲之齡仙逝。據報載,王先生臨終前所受的病痛折磨不太多。也許,上天知道,他一生曾帶給數百萬台灣觀眾歡樂,而特別垂憐吧。

王先生並未出現在上面這張劇照中,今天的自由時報影視名人版記者弄錯了。

五十歲以上的台灣人大概很少人不知道,那是《王哥柳哥遊台灣》(1958)的劇照。三輪車後座穿深色衣服的角色是「柳哥」,飾演者是家喻戶曉的喜劇泰斗矮仔財1916-1992)。後來的「王哥柳哥」系列影片大多由他主演。

矮仔財原名張福財,他在二次大戰期間即已嶄露頭角,不僅在電影院擔任辯士,也參與劇場演出。就我記憶所及,他在戰前的照片中摩登而帥氣,跟後來黏在 台語演員身上的「鄉土」刻板印象,完全是兩回事。以戰前與戰後初年台灣劇場活動鼎盛的狀況來看,若非二二八屠殺以及後來的白色恐怖造成劇場工作者與文學家 死的死、關的關、逃的逃,若非威權體制下的重重禁制、檢查與監視,台灣演藝事業也許早在楊德昌、侯孝賢這些人之前,就已在國際上大放光芒,而也許矮仔財因 之有機會成為國際巨星。雖然只是也許,但那個時代真的埋沒了許多機會,許多生機。

不過,矮仔財畢竟還算幸運。曾經盛極一時的台語片使他成為國內的大明星,當時,他的名字幾乎就是票房保證,跟後來的秦漢許不了一樣。

王泰山小他一輩,運氣也差多了。他出道時,台語片已經到了即將由極盛而轉為快速沒落的節骨眼。他雖然是位相當認真的演員,但隨著台語影劇的餅越來越 小,他扮演主角的機會越來越少。包括他與矮仔財在內,很多台語演員在台語片沒落後,跳入螢光幕中。但是演連續劇並不保證天天有戲可演:面對台語開始在電視 大量出現,國民黨政府很快祭出緊箍咒,嚴厲限制台語連續劇的播出時間與時段。由於只剩每天半小時的配額(還得再被廣告瓜分),所有那一輩台語演員,即使是 矮仔財這種天才型人物,也只能像動物園籠子裡的獅子,無從大顯身手。說他們是失落的一代,並不為過。

回過頭來談王泰山先生辭世的消息。查了一下聯合中國兩小報都未見報導,這當然不令人驚訝。至於兩大報,自由時報之報導有誤,而蘋果日報也沒好到哪裡去:

他曾是1960年代台語片時期重要的喜劇演員,以《王哥柳哥》系列紅遍全台〔...〕

在電子媒體方面,我只查到東森與民視有相關報導。東森有兩則報導,第一則(2007/05/24 12:33)也把兩個柳哥搞混了,五個小時後所發佈的第二則相關新聞2007/05/24 17:52)則已改正過來,大概,昨天下午有人提醒東森記者,王泰山其實是「二代柳哥」。出現在今天早上的民視報導則大致正確。從這個時序來看,自由時報影藝記者陳慧貞小姐,您就別怪我要在這裡碎碎念念:您在資料收集上還有待加強。

話說回來,這些記者可能因為太年輕,而不太清楚那些「王哥柳哥」往事。這個現象也透露出,許多影藝線記者對台灣影劇歷史的知識有待加強。更仔細地 說,他們的相關知識其實是被意識型態透鏡所過濾過的,而同樣的過濾也發生在他們目前的新聞處理上。換言之,這是一個循環。不關心現下時空中的某一部份,也 就不會去注意其 歷史;而一旦動手去碰觸其歷史,發生錯誤的機率就相對偏高。

前一陣子曾經引起軒然大波的三立二二八影集製作者應該也是栽在類似的問題上。若要細究其來龍去脈,應該還可以溯及以下問題:媒體人當年在學校中到底 學了多少台灣媒體歷史。若知戰後初年,台灣的新聞影片製作條件極其惡劣(從終戰到二二八,國民黨派人來接收日人器材,而非派人帶攝影機與膠卷來台灣作報 導),就比較不容易在看到其實拍攝於上海的影像時,逕而誤認為是在台灣拍攝。

其實台灣人,包括所謂的菁英在內,大多數對台灣史的掌握程度沒細到這種程度(即使這不算是專家級知識)。拿這種層次的考題去考NCC委員,能考過關的有幾人?若全部當掉,我一點也不會驚訝。

說到NCC,我倒想請教NCC諸公:像這種關於「柳哥」的報導錯誤該不該罰?我還真的有點希望這類錯誤都比照三立案,每個都罰一百萬,這樣一來,我們的所得免稅額大概都可以向上提升(國稅局官員有興趣的話,不妨到聯合滋事庫與媒體對抗裡找資料來估算金礦的價值)。

自己也身在媒體影像中的NCC委員也許知道,也許不知道:只要一打開電視新聞頻道,就有發掘不盡的笑料。這種情況大概可以解釋為什麼,比較起許不了的年代,台灣諧星的市場萎縮得有夠嚴重。這真是個令人哭笑不得的現象。

The Lesson of the Sand Mandala

By DAVID WATERS, Scripps Howard News Service, June 28, 2006



Memphis, TN (USA) -- A few years ago, my wife and I took our two American sons to see 11 Tibetan Buddhist nuns. Not since Gulliver sailed to the land of Lilliputians has there been the potential for such a culture clash.


The nuns, driven from Tibet by Communist Chinese, live in exile at a nunnery in Nepal, but they were touring North America. When my sons arrived, exiled from the TV, the nuns were demonstrating the meditative ritual of making a sand mandala.

A sand mandala is a sacred masterpiece, a large geometrical design created meticulously with millions of grains of hand-crushed, vegetable-dyed marble.

The nuns sat silently and still for hours, leaning almost prostrate over an elaborate blueprint as they applied several grains at a time. The nuns said they don't worry that a sneeze or breeze will turn their design into dunes. They had yet to meet my 4-year-old son, Luke.

If the world were a chair, Luke couldn't live in it. His boisterous little body seems finely tuned to the fact that he's living on a rotating rock hurtling through space.

As Luke bounced precariously around the edge of the most amazing sandbox he ever saw, I was sure I was about to witness my first international incident. The nuns didn't seem to notice. Buddhists believe that practicing proper forms of concentration is the final step on the path to nirvana - perfect peace and happiness.

Apparently, these nuns are well along Buddha's path.

Buddha gave up a life of luxury to follow his path to enlightenment 2,500 years ago. He taught that people could find perfect peace and happiness by breaking attachments to worldly things.

This was long before the Home Shopping Network. And Buddha never encountered Zach, my brand-name-wearing, high-tech-craving 15-year-old son.

I thought Zach would be enthralled by the mandala. He's a talented artist. He's also the creature of a blockbuster, theme-park culture that turns beanbag toys into icons and religious objects into knickknacks.

So when he saw the mandala, he was a bit disappointed. "That's it?" he said. He figured something that takes days to construct at least would be something he could walk through. Then he found out what the nuns were going to do with the mandala when they finished it. Disappointment dissolved into disbelief.

Tuesday afternoon, after spending hours carefully constructing the mandala, the nuns swept the sand into a bowl and tossed it into a nearby lake. That's part of the ritual of making a mandala, a final act of letting go of the material in favor of the spiritual.

"But they could frame it and keep it," Zach said. "They could sell it and make some money."

I was a bit confused, too, at first. Why destroy it? But as I concentrated on the mandala, I felt a peace about it.

Someone somewhere still believes that beauty is a creation, not a collection. That holiness is a process, not a product. That what is sacred is not for sale.

Rainbow warrior

by GEERT DE WEYER





Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama was recognised at the age of three as the reincarnation of his predecessor.
Picture: Phil Wilkinson


IT IS day two of the Dalai Lama's week-long visit to Belgium, and the cramped smile on his face speaks volumes. Would he please pose in front of a colourful - and rather dreadful - mural? For a moment he seems on the verge of moving, but then he shakes his head and replies that the painting is too ugly to pose in front of. He continues with a tale of how he was once speaking to a Japanese friend about tasteless paintings such as this one, and "that friend later had to spend the night in a room with monstrous illustrations," he laughs. "He didn't sleep a wink."

The security guards and his entourage stand around the Tibetan leader, waiting, shepherding him along and only just stopping short of tugging on his sleeve. "Your Holiness, it is time to go," he is told softly, but decisively. The Dalai Lama is in his element. His programme includes an interview with yours truly and a meeting with representatives from the Catholic, Islamic and Jewish faiths, but the jack-in-the-box, as the security guards call him, still finds time to jump out of the car to say hello to some passers-by.

Tenzin Gyatso, the 14th Dalai Lama (Mongolian for 'ocean of wisdom'), was recognised at the age of three as the reincarnation of his predecessor. At four he was crowned in Lhasa, the capital of Tibet, to be the leader of his people. By six he was a monk, being educated with a view to helping his country through difficult periods of political conflict. Then, on March 17, 1959, the Dalai Lama, regarded as the most eminent authority in the Buddhist world and the head of state of Tibet, was forced to flee his beloved homeland. A Tibetan uprising had brought about a crackdown by the Chinese, which left the 24-year-old holy leader and his entourage running for their lives. They escaped to India, where the country's first prime minister, Pandit Nehru, offered political asylum to the Dalai Lama and 80,000 other Tibetans. The exiled leader was also given a place to live, in Dharamsala, which has remained his home to this day.

Now the Dalai Lama spends his time travelling the world. He has been to Scotland twice in the past two years. On his most recent visit, last November, he praised the Scottish Parliament and devolution as well as discussing personal ethics for modern life. He says that the purpose of his international tours is to draw attention to his philosophy; the Chinese say it is to promote Tibetan independence.

He has written dozens of books on the themes of a balanced life, compassion, universal responsibility and accountability, world peace and religious tolerance. His most recent book, however, fits into an entirely different discipline. It debates the beginning of the universe, genetic manipulation and the evolution of species. Entitled The Universe in a Single Atom (Lannoo, 2005), it delves into the common ground between spirituality and recent discoveries in physics, biology and even quantum mechanics.

The Dalai Lama admits that he is a soul in search of the truth - which, he says, owing to new scientific insights, may turn out to be different than originally thought. "Buddhism is based on discovery and experimentation," he says. "Buddha himself taught us that we should have the freedom to experiment, and it is important how we view the reality all around us. From one perspective you only see a limited view of reality, which changes completely when you look at it from another angle. So what is reality? Yet in both cases we are discussing the same universal reality. Now that concept becomes complicated if I view that reality from my Buddhist state. But it differs from other traditions and cultures, where other philosophies prevail. That, too, is reality."

The Dalai Lama stands by the concept of 'one truth, one religion', saying, "For me, Buddhism is the only truth and the only religion. But my Christian brothers and sisters say the same about Christianity. Result: different truths and different religions. That makes things difficult. Therefore we should try to operate from only one religion or truth."

This may seem like a strange pronouncement, but the Dalai Lama believes that we in the West are better off sticking to our own religion rather than shopping around. "As a Westerner, you have a culture of your own. That culture is heavily influenced by Christianity. For that reason it is healthier to continue in the same tradition. Otherwise frustration will result," he says.

"Some people have a different opinion or look towards other traditions. There is nothing wrong with that, as long as you are convinced that your own religion has no more effect on you. But I would hope that one does not criticise one's own traditions. You have to keep showing respect, because religion is good and a source of inspiration to many people."

But the Dalai Lama's favourite topic is science, sparked by his discovery as a child, more than 60 years ago, of a copper telescope, a wind-up clock and illustrated books about the First World War, which had been hidden at his official winter residence, the Potala Palace. For the last 20 years, he has brought Buddhism into line with modern scientific thinking."We don't discuss reincarnation, karma or nirvana with scientists. That is a different area. We talk about cosmology, psychology. Those are themes that Buddhism covers, and it is useful to learn about the most recent scientific findings. It enlarges our knowledge. It is not that we want to convert scientists or non-believers to Buddhism, or that scientists are trying to make non-believers of us," he laughs.

"Modern scientists are starting to realise that life is fed by constructive and destructive emotions, so now they are studying emotion. Experiments are being done with students meditating for half an hour every day. After three weeks a difference can already be observed in their behaviour. That knowledge serves humankind," he says. "In our institute we have introduced science as a subject for a select group of monks. In the end we hope it can become a full-time study. We need that type of knowledge."

He accepts the view that the human race, while materially successful, is failing spiritually. "We are capable of much, but when something goes wrong it leads to catastrophe, depression, suicide... Despite our intelligence, we have a tendency to concentrate on one point. For example, if your mother were to die, for a whole day you can think of nothing else. And you grow towards depression. But when you take into account the fact that your mother died without pain, or in a happy way, and that you have many friends who can offer support, that should be a consolation and cause for new inspiration."

The Dalai Lama also believes that we lack balance as a result of too much stress, emphasising the importance of education. "From pre-school onwards, people have to learn to stay balanced. Many direct all their hope towards making money, but when something goes wrong in that regard they get depressed and can end up homeless or frustrated," he says.

Buddhism also has its conservative side, and sex is a thorny issue. I ask him why religions often have so many problems with sexuality and expect their followers to lead celibate lives. His Holiness's entourage look a bit startled at the question, but the Dalai Lama answers with almost visible pleasure. "Buddhism and Catholicism have reasons for preferring celibacy. One of those is that we can practise detachment. You see, desire and attachment can be obstacles for our spirituality. We need to watch out for that."

And homosexuality? He laughs. "All forms of sexuality are viewed as undesirable behaviour for monks and nuns." Why? He laughs loudly. "The goal of sex is reproduction."

My comment that it may be pleasurable all the same is met with a sharp giggle. The entourage giggle along, albeit a little uncomfortably. Then he says, "The point is that when you decide to take your religion or tradition seriously, you should follow its principles. But if you do not have that interest it is up to you to decide what you want to do. I think anything can be done then, as long as it is consensual. Then there is no problem if men do it with men, women with women."

The conversation moves back to the topic of Tibet. Last year the Dalai Lama was not welcome here in Belgium. The Chinese were being difficult, and to avoid a political row Belgian officials chose the easy option. "It was clear to me that it was not a good moment for the government," he says with a shrug, "No problem, I thought, I'll go there next year."

Meanwhile, he remains hopeful about the Chinese attitude towards Tibet, suggesting that the country will have to go along with the international trend of increasing openness, human rights and religious freedom. The Dalai Lama is sure about it: the regime is changing. "Very, very slowly," he emphasises, "but change it does." He says that many Chinese these days show respect, admiration and interest in Buddhism, and he is sure that the government will too. It is only a matter of time. He also believes that there are already changes within the government. For the first time in 60 years, there was a conference on Buddhism and there is even some talk of opening Buddhist schools. "That makes me happy. It is a clear sign that China may be striving towards a more open, more democratic society, even if it is a slow process. I am not seeking separation, I am only looking for a solution for us and the Chinese. Distrust is the biggest obstacle between any two parties."

One area of regret for him is in the gradual disappearance of the Tibetan language. "In that sense there is definitely a cultural genocide in progress, intentional or not. Naturally, the Chinese population is growing very quickly, and they are looking for areas, such as Tibet, that are suitable for the Chinese," he says.

He takes hope from talks that have taken place with Chinese government officials in the last four years. "Formerly, contact and communications with them were officially denied. Those talks are still being held. They help ease the distrust," he says. "We will see where it leads."